Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

RED PEAK TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC

RED PEAK TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC received $14.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 37 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $78.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($12.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.9M
New awards
37
Sole-source
15%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GLLFCJNAGHM8
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $14.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. RED PEAK TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $14.9M
  2. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.6KFY2020
  2. 6.9MFY2021
  3. 3.8MFY2022
  4. 8.5MFY2023
  5. 21.9MFY2024
  6. 22.6MFY2025
  7. 14.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 26 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$14M94%
  2. Equipment maintenance$872.5K5.9%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$34.9K0.2%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition15%
    US 39% · $2.2M
  • Sole-source awards15%
    US 30% · $2.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$117.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of State · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Equipment maintenance· Sep 29, 2022 – Mar 4, 2026· N6523622F0828
  2. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 29, 2021 – Apr 16, 2026· 70RDAD21C00000016
  3. Department of the Navy· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Mar 30, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· N6449826F3038
  4. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 28, 2024 – Aug 12, 2026· 70RDA124C00000003
  5. Department of the Air Force· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 21, 2024 – Apr 28, 2026· FA301624P0189
  6. Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Professional services· Jan 8, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· N6852026F0102
  7. Department of State· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Mar 14, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· 19AQMM25F0484
  8. Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Professional services· Feb 4, 2025 – Jan 8, 2026· N6852025F0063

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.2M (19 subawards)

9 sub-recipients

  1. CONTROL SYSTEM INNOVATORS LLC$955.2K43%
    GAFFNEY, SC · 3 subawards
  2. ANIXTER INC$348.3K16%
    GLENVIEW, IL · 4 subawards
  3. WILMINGTON, DE · 4 subawards
  4. ANIXTER INC.$177.9K8.0%
    METAIRIE, LA · 1 subaward
  5. SF&B, INC.$154.6K7.0%
    LONGMONT, CO · 2 subawards
  6. EL PASO, TX · 2 subawards
  7. RALEIGH, NC · 1 subaward
  8. RUBEN ACOSTA$70K3.2%
    LA MESA, CA · 1 subaward
  9. HIAWATHA, IA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 15% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $797.2K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $3.8M paid out · $62.3K received
  • FY2024: $6.9M paid out · $133.1K received
  • FY2025: $5.6M paid out · $665.3K received
  • FY2026: $2.2M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

38 companies · $20.7M reported

  1. TINTON FALLS, NJ · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. CONTROL SYSTEM INNOVATORS LLC$1.2M
    GAFFNEY, SC · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $860.7K reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HERNDON, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. M.T.G. SERVICES, INC.$50.2M−31% in FY2026
    LAKEHURST, NJ · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALPHA OMEGA GROUP LLC$50.8M−46% in FY2026
    RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MANDEX INC$55.8M−27% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.