Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
RED PEAK TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC
RED PEAK TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC received $14.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 37 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $78.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($12.7M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $14.9M
- New awards
- 37
- Sole-source
- 15%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- GLLFCJNAGHM8
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $14.9M in FY2026 together.
- RED PEAK TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page$14.9M
- RED PEAK TECHNICAL SERVICES LLCKODIAK, AK$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 16.6KFY2020
- 6.9MFY2021
- 3.8MFY2022
- 8.5MFY2023
- 21.9MFY2024
- 22.6MFY2025
- 14.9MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$12.7M85%26 awards
- Department of State$1.7M12%3 awards
- Office of Procurement Operations$568.2K3.8%2 awards
- 1 awards
- Defense Contract Management Agency-$125.9K0.0%5 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$14M94%
- Equipment maintenance$872.5K5.9%
- Other equipment & supplies$34.9K0.2%
Where the work was performed
- Craven County, NC$7.5M50%
- Anchorage Municipality, AK$3.2M21%
- Fairfax County, VA$1.7M12%
- Duval County, FL$1M6.8%
- San Diego County, CA$912.1K6.1%
- District of Columbia, DC$568.2K3.8%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition15%US 39% · $2.2M
- Sole-source awards15%US 30% · $2.3M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · -$117.4K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of State$1.7MDepartment of State · 2 awards
Largest awards
- BASE MIRAMAR$5.2MDefense Contract Management Agency· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Equipment maintenance· Sep 29, 2022 – Mar 4, 2026· N6523622F0828
- Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 29, 2021 – Apr 16, 2026· 70RDAD21C00000016
- Department of the Navy· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Mar 30, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· N6449826F3038
- Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 28, 2024 – Aug 12, 2026· 70RDA124C00000003
- Department of the Air Force· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 21, 2024 – Apr 28, 2026· FA301624P0189
- Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Professional services· Jan 8, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· N6852026F0102
- Department of State· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Mar 14, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· 19AQMM25F0484
- Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Professional services· Feb 4, 2025 – Jan 8, 2026· N6852025F0063
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $2.2M (19 subawards)
9 sub-recipients
- CONTROL SYSTEM INNOVATORS LLC$955.2K43%GAFFNEY, SC · 3 subawards
- ANIXTER INC$348.3K16%GLENVIEW, IL · 4 subawards
- HONEYWELL SECURITY AMERICAS LLC$306.7K14%WILMINGTON, DE · 4 subawards
- ANIXTER INC.$177.9K8.0%METAIRIE, LA · 1 subaward
- SF&B, INC.$154.6K7.0%LONGMONT, CO · 2 subawards
- SPECTRUM IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC$95.5K4.3%EL PASO, TX · 2 subawards
- TEGO DATA SYSTEMS, LLC$81.3K3.7%RALEIGH, NC · 1 subaward
- RUBEN ACOSTA$70K3.2%LA MESA, CA · 1 subaward
- MOBILEDEMAND, L.C.$31.9K1.4%HIAWATHA, IA · 1 subaward
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Its reported sub-contracts equal 15% of its FY2026 contract obligations.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $797.2K paid out · $0 received
- FY2023: $3.8M paid out · $62.3K received
- FY2024: $6.9M paid out · $133.1K received
- FY2025: $5.6M paid out · $665.3K received
- FY2026: $2.2M paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
38 companies · $20.7M reported
- EPS CORPORATION$5.8MTINTON FALLS, NJ · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- RSSI BARRIERS LLC$1.6MPANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
- CONTROL SYSTEM INNOVATORS LLC$1.2MGAFFNEY, SC · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
3 companies · $860.7K reported
- BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$518.3KMCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- SERCO INC$280KHERNDON, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- KBR SERVICES, LLC$62.3KHOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Investigation and security services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- M.T.G. SERVICES, INC.$50.2M−31% in FY2026LAKEHURST, NJ · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- ALPHA OMEGA GROUP LLC$50.8M−46% in FY2026RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- MANDEX INC$55.8M−27% in FY2026FAIRFAX, VA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.