Federal contractor · ASCHAFFENBURG

REFORM GRINDING TECHNOLOGY GMBH

REFORM GRINDING TECHNOLOGY GMBH received $88.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−48% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($88.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$88.6K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FJAKFEHP6CB9
Parent company
CKGP/PW & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ZIEHM-ORTHOSCAN INC company family: 2 registered entities, $4.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ZIEHM-ORTHOSCAN INCSCOTTSDALE, AZ · Family page
    $4.3M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 125.1KFY2017
  2. 179.7KFY2018
  3. 79.9KFY2019
  4. 40.8KFY2020
  5. 117.6KFY2021
  6. 119.3KFY2022
  7. 3.5KFY2023
  8. 104.2KFY2024
  9. 168.9KFY2025
  10. 88.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$88.6K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$88.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Oklahoma County, OK$88.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $88.6K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $88.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. REFORM TIP GRINDER MAINTENANCE SERVICES$340.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Mar 8, 2024 – Feb 11, 2026· FA813224P0010

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MASIMO CORPORATION$7.1M−35% in FY2026
    IRVINE, CA · 2 entities · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalersVeterans Affairs · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing
  2. ENDOSCOPY MD, LLC$6.3M−20% in FY2026
    OXFORD, PA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers
  3. FORT DEFIANCE INDUSTRIES LLC$6.8M+597% in FY2026
    LOUDON, TN · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.