Federal contractor · FRANKLIN, TN

RELIABLE MICROSYSTEMS LLC

RELIABLE MICROSYSTEMS LLC received $398.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+184% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $3.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($398.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$398.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
75%
UEI
D1M6RD37EYQ4
Parent company
RELIABLE MICROSYSTEMS LLC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2018
  2. 0FY2020
  3. 0FY2021
  4. 138.1KFY2022
  5. 19.4KFY2023
  6. 2MFY2024
  7. 140.4KFY2025
  8. 398.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$398.4K99.9%
    2 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.1%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$398.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Williamson County, TN$398.4K99.9%
  2. Madison County, AL$5000.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition75%
    US 39% · $298.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions75%
    US 8.8% · $298.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 873AUTHORITY$1.2M
    Department of the Navy· Williamson County, TN· Research & development· Feb 12, 2024 – Apr 7, 2026· N6426724C0054
  2. 873AUTHORITY$239.8K
    Department of the Navy· Williamson County, TN· Research & development· Aug 1, 2025 – Apr 2, 2026· N6426725C7093
  3. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FF343

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $315K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC., THE$315K100%
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $837.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $10.4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $315K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $11.6M reported

  1. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$10.5M
    MCLEAN, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$693.6K
    MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC.$315K
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SENSING STRATEGIES, INC.$4.1M+765% in FY2026
    PENNINGTON, NJ · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Threat Reduction Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. H S OWEN LLC$1.4M−98% in FY2026
    MEDFORD, NJ · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. JUNGK NGUYEN INNOVATIONS LLC$1.5M
    STANTON, CA · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.