Federal contractor · MC LEAN, VA

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED received $7.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−46% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $97.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($7.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.1M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NX49KNJK4JX6
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.9MFY2017
  2. 9.6MFY2018
  3. 14.3MFY2019
  4. 7.5MFY2020
  5. 7.8MFY2021
  6. 9.6MFY2022
  7. 9.2MFY2023
  8. 9.1MFY2024
  9. 13.1MFY2025
  10. 7.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$6.7M94%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$425.4K6.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Noble County, IN$103.5K1.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$1,500
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$1,500
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Research & development· Feb 25, 2022 – May 8, 2026· N6660422F3000
  2. Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 20, 2025 – Feb 9, 2026· N6660425P0007
  3. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 30, 2025 – Dec 2, 2025· N6660425P0794
  4. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 20, 2026 – Mar 20, 2026· N6660426FR325
  5. Department of the Navy· Noble County, IN· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 6, 2026 – May 8, 2026· N6660426P0070

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $349K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $47.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $6.8M reported

  1. MIDDLETOWN, RI · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PAWCATUCK, CT · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RESTON, VA · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMERICAN ELECTRONICS, INC.$24.5M−73% in FY2026
    CALIFORNIA, MD · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$24M−41% in FY2026
    WAYNE, PA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ELS, INC.$23.8M+25% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.