Federal contractor · MARLTON, NJ
RESOLUTION MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC
RESOLUTION MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+302% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.3M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($1.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.2M
- New awards
- 8
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 77%
- UEI
- L7BLL8CPE3M6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 194.3KFY2017
- -36KFY2018
- 1.2MFY2019
- 74.4KFY2020
- 118.9KFY2021
- 2.1MFY2022
- 108KFY2024
- 303.9KFY2025
- 1.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Federal Aviation Administration$1.1M88%4 awards
- Department of State$151.4K12%4 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$1.1M88%
- Construction & real property$151.4K12%
Where the work was performed
- Monroe County, FL$374.9K31%
- Burlington County, NJ$277.3K23%
- Comanche County, OK$232.3K19%
- Charleston County, SC$185.7K15%
- Abroad$151.4K12%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition77%US 39% · $944.4K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions77%US 8.7% · $944.4K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Federal Aviation Administration· Monroe County, FL· Professional services· Jul 24, 2026 – Jul 24, 2026· 697DCK26F00757
- Federal Aviation Administration· Burlington County, NJ· Professional services· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· 697DCK26F00447
- Federal Aviation Administration· Comanche County, OK· Professional services· Feb 25, 2026 – Feb 25, 2026· 697DCK26F00249
- Federal Aviation Administration· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Feb 26, 2026 – Feb 26, 2026· 697DCK26F00257
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- LANHAM, MD · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ATLANTA, GA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- LUMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$953.2KFAIRFAX, VA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.