Federal contractor · SINGAPORE

RIO LOGISTICS (S) PTE. LTD.

RIO LOGISTICS (S) PTE. LTD. received $433K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+415% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($430K).

Obligations · FY2026
$433K
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PGU6JKT5X6S3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 183.9KFY2017
  2. 193KFY2018
  3. 505.4KFY2019
  4. 1.7MFY2020
  5. 674.4KFY2021
  6. 1.9MFY2022
  7. 1.8MFY2023
  8. 18KFY2024
  9. 84.1KFY2025
  10. 433KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$235.1K53%
  2. Professional services$106.2K24%
  3. Transportation & logistics$104.1K23%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$433K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Facilities & utilities· Mar 25, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· N6264926FQ095
  2. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Mar 27, 2026 – May 19, 2026· N6264926FM043
  3. Department of the Navy· Transportation & logistics· Apr 23, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· N6264926FM051
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Facilities & utilities· Sep 26, 2025 – Mar 17, 2026· 70Z02325F92200029
  5. Department of the Navy· IT & telecom· Sep 9, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· N6264925FMA20
  6. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Mar 9, 2026 – Mar 11, 2026· N6264926FM039
  7. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Jan 21, 2026 – Jan 21, 2026· N6264926FM030

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $49K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $72.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $84.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $49K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $206.8K reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 4 subawards · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PIKE DISTRICT PARTNERSHIP, INC$234.1K−100% in FY2026
    POTOMAC, MD · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. PRESCOTT, AZ · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CONNECT INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC$258.5K+14,571% in FY2026
    LAVEEN, AZ · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.