Federal contractor · SANTA BARBARA, CA

ROBERT D. NIEHAUS, INC.

ROBERT D. NIEHAUS, INC. received $1.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $22.7M. Its largest customer was Defense Human Resources Activity ($1.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.7M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DCJZCVNNMKW4
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.7MFY2017
  2. 1.3MFY2018
  3. 1.8MFY2019
  4. 2.2MFY2020
  5. 2.1MFY2021
  6. 2.3MFY2022
  7. 2.6MFY2023
  8. 1.9MFY2024
  9. 4.2MFY2025
  10. 1.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$500
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$500
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Human Resources Activity· Santa Barbara County, CA· Professional services· Jan 27, 2026 – Jan 27, 2026· H9821026FE028
  2. Defense Human Resources Activity· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· Nov 1, 2021 – May 5, 2026· H9821022F0001
  3. Defense Human Resources Activity· Santa Barbara County, CA· Professional services· Oct 31, 2022 – Apr 24, 2026· H9821023F0003
  4. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 25, 2025 – Feb 18, 2026· N0018925F3048
  5. Defense Human Resources Activity· Santa Barbara County, CA· Professional services· Mar 4, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· H9821026FE047
  6. Department of the Navy· Santa Barbara County, CA· Professional services· Jan 2, 2019 – Jun 8, 2026· N0017819F8433

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $535.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $186.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $815.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $535.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $6.6M reported

  1. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CLASON POINT PARTNERS INC.$12.6M−97% in FY2026
    YONKERS, NY · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Human Resources Activity · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. EXIGENT SERVICES LLC$10.1M−100% in FY2026
    BOWIE, MD · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Human Resources Activity · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Human Resources Activity · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.