Federal contractor · KATONAH, NY

ROBERT SIEGEL

ROBERT SIEGEL received $378.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $5.2M. Its largest customer was Department of State ($378.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$378.3K
New awards
11
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
71%
UEI
JLLDH1TNXKP3
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 364.8KFY2020
  2. 183.5KFY2021
  3. 941KFY2022
  4. 2MFY2023
  5. 452.2KFY2024
  6. 899.4KFY2025
  7. 378.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$378.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$378.3K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition71%
    US 39% · $267.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions71%
    US 8.8% · $267.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of State· Construction & real property· Feb 15, 2023 – Jul 16, 2026· 19AQMM23F0603
  2. Department of State· Construction & real property· Aug 18, 2022 – Mar 5, 2026· 19AQMM22F3013
  3. Department of State· Construction & real property· Feb 3, 2025 – Jul 8, 2026· 19AQMM25F0319
  4. Department of State· Construction & real property· Feb 3, 2025 – Jul 27, 2026· 19AQMM25F0318
  5. Department of State· Construction & real property· Jan 14, 2025 – Aug 20, 2026· 19AQMM25F0247
  6. Department of State· Construction & real property· Apr 2, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 19AQMM26F0434
  7. Department of State· Construction & real property· Dec 18, 2024 – Aug 5, 2026· 19AQMM25F0173
  8. Department of State· Construction & real property· Aug 26, 2022 – Aug 18, 2026· 19AQMM22F3170

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NEW YORK, NY · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PORTLAND, OR · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CLAIRE WEISZ ARCHITECTS LLP$2.4M−101% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.