Federal contractor · JACKSONVILLE, FL

RS&H, INC.

RS&H, INC. received $220.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+87% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.8M. Its largest customer was Federal Highway Administration ($220.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$220.6K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
JYQPV9L5B1G8
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the RS&H, INC. company family: 3 registered entities, $2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. RS&H, INC.MERRITT ISLAND, FL · Family page
    $1.8M
  2. RS&H, INC.HOUSTON, TX
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.7MFY2017
  2. 2MFY2018
  3. 2.3MFY2019
  4. 1.5MFY2020
  5. 2.6MFY2021
  6. 3.6MFY2022
  7. 1.4MFY2023
  8. 407.6KFY2024
  9. 117.8KFY2025
  10. 220.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$220.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $220.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $220.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Highway Administration· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· 6982AF26F00048N
  2. Department of the Navy· Duval County, FL· Professional services· Jul 14, 2021 – Mar 31, 2026· N0017821F9317
  3. Department of the Army· St. Louis County, MN· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2025 – Jan 5, 2026· W50S7F25FA022

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $854.6K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $35.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2.6M reported

  1. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$2.1M
    DENVER, CO · 7 subawards
  2. SPARKS, NV · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MERRICK-IMEG JOINT VENTURE, LLP$6.8M+678,169% in FY2026
    GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ACCURA ROSSER 8A JV LLC$7.1M−100% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ALACHUA, FL · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.