Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, CT
RTI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
RTI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−65% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $13.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($612.5K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.1M
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- SJJFPNZ1K493
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.1M in FY2026 together.
- RTI TECHNOLOGIES, LLCCOLUMBIA, CT · Family page$1.1M
- RTI TECHNOLOGIES, LLCMC EWEN, TN$0
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 332KFY2017
- 121.7KFY2018
- 3MFY2019
- 622.2KFY2020
- 1.5MFY2021
- 1.1MFY2022
- 579.6KFY2023
- 1.7MFY2024
- 3.1MFY2025
- 1.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$612.5K56%5 awards
- Department of the Navy$489.8K44%1 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$1.1M100%
Where the work was performed
- Jefferson County, AR$62.9K5.7%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Defense Contract Management Agency· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 31, 2025 – May 13, 2026· N0017425F0314
- Department of the Army· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 8, 2025 – Nov 24, 2025· W15QKN25F0277
- Department of the Navy· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· N0017426F1113
- Department of the Army· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· W15QKN26F0167
- Department of the Army· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 16, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W911S226PA418
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, AR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 21, 2025 – May 18, 2026· W519TC25P2248
- Department of the Army· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 20, 2026 – Mar 20, 2026· W519TC26PA111
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $32K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $75K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $107K reported
- SIMSBURY, CT · 2 subawards · Other chemical product and preparation manufacturing
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MODULAR CONTAINER SYSTEMS, INC.$2.1M−100% in FY2026LAVONIA, GA · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
- HALE HAMILTON (VALVES) LIMITED$4.4M−73% in FY2026UXBRIDGE, GBR · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Contract Management Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
- LEWIS ENGINEERING COMPANY$2.9M−100% in FY2026MARSHALL, TX · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.