Federal contractor · LINCOLN, NE
RTP ARMOR, LLC
RTP ARMOR, LLC received $25K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−19% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $446.9K. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($25K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $25K
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- CE2SHVNZKG69
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 5.8KFY2018
- 16.5KFY2019
- 33.1KFY2020
- 13.2KFY2021
- 26.4KFY2022
- 12.6KFY2023
- 283.2KFY2024
- 31KFY2025
- 25KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Defense Logistics Agency$25K100%7 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$25K100%
Where the work was performed
- Lancaster County, NE$24.4K98%
- Clay County, MO$6092.4%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Defense Logistics Agency· Lancaster County, NE· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 26, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026· SPE7M126P4927
- Defense Logistics Agency· Riverside County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 29, 2025 – Oct 6, 2025· SPE8E625P0979
- Defense Logistics Agency· Lancaster County, NE· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 14, 2026 – May 14, 2026· SPE7L126V9846
- Defense Logistics Agency· Lancaster County, NE· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· SPE7L726V0593
- Defense Logistics Agency· Lancaster County, NE· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 21, 2025 – Oct 21, 2025· SPE7L226V0038
- Defense Logistics Agency· Clay County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 25, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· SPE7L726V0209
- Defense Logistics Agency· Lancaster County, NE· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· SPE7L126V7390
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- VIENNA, VA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
- STS OPERATING, INC.$222.9KSEATTLE, WA · 7 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
- FORENTA LP$247.3K+224% in FY2026MORRISTOWN, TN · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.