Federal contractor · SAN FRANCISCO, CA

RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE

RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE received $291.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2017: $4.2M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($291.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$291.8K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TCEQPQE71195
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 306.7KFY2017
  2. 619.7KFY2018
  3. 1.5MFY2019
  4. 671.5KFY2020
  5. 1.2MFY2021
  6. -636.8KFY2022
  7. -60.7KFY2023
  8. 342.3KFY2024
  9. -38.3KFY2025
  10. 291.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Public Buildings Service$291.8K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$291.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Francisco County, CA$291.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 101 MISSION ST STE 300, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1745 TACOMA UNION STATION THIRD PARTY PEER REVIEW SERVICES$291.8K
    Public Buildings Service· San Francisco County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 15, 2026 – Jul 15, 2026· 47PB5326F0005
  2. 911 SEISMIC EVALUATION STUDY$93.7K
    Public Buildings Service· Multnomah County, OR· Construction & real property· Feb 21, 2024 – Apr 1, 2026· 47PL0324F0004

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INC$594.5K
    BINGHAM FARMS, MI · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GRISKELIS YOUNG HARRELL, LTD.$598.5K
    CHICAGO, IL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. K2A, LLP$599.5K
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.