Federal contractor · HAWTHORNE, CA

S2 GLOBAL INC

S2 GLOBAL INC received $5.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+231% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $10.1M. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($5.7M).

Obligations · FY2026: $5.7M
New awards: 3
Sole-source: 0.0%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: KK9VML2JGEL9
Parent company: OSI SYSTEMS, INC.

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the RAPISCAN SYSTEMS INC company family: 4 registered entities, $158.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

RAPISCAN SYSTEMS INCTORRANCE, CA · Family page
Reported parent$152M
RAPISCAN GOVERNMENT SERVICES INCARLINGTON, VA
Reported parent$380.2K
OSI OPTOELECTRONICS, INCHAWTHORNE, CA
Reported parent$0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

128KFY2019
0FY2020
127KFY2021
131KFY2022
2.3MFY2024
1.7MFY2025
5.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection$5.7M100%
1 awards
Department of State$00.0%
2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

IT & telecom$5.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Los Angeles County, CA$5.7M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition0.0%
US 39% · $0
Sole-source awards0.0%
US 30% · $0
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.8% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

CONTRACT 70B04C25C00000042 IS FOR THE U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION OFFICE OF FIELD OPERATIONS (OFO) AND OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY (OIT) NON-INTRUSIVE INSPECTION (NII) COMMON INTEGRATION PLATFORM (CIP) AND COMMON VIEWER (CV).$7.2M
U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Aug 29, 2025 – Sep 1, 2026· 70B04C25C00000042
TCL CENTRALIZED INTEGRATION PLATFORM$2.3M
Department of State· IT & telecom· Feb 8, 2024 – Aug 27, 2026· 19GE5024P0009
1930.0 INL SAN JOSE B&P SCANNERS INTEGRATION$225K
Department of State· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2025 – May 12, 2026· 19CS8025P1102

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

FY2024: $0 paid out · $113.5K received
FY2025: $0 paid out · $999.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

18 companies · $247M reported

LEIDOS, INC.$179.1M
RESTON, VA · 6 subawards · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$26.6M
GROTON, CT · 111 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED)$10.8M
WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 54 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

S & K SECURITY GROUP LLC$137.6M+67,341% in FY2026
SAINT IGNATIUS, MT · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
ASTROPHYSICS INC$97.9M+155% in FY2026
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
ELBITAMERICA, INC.$631.3M+393% in FY2026
FORT WORTH, TX · 6 entities · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of RAPISCAN SYSTEMS INC (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

Rapiscan Systems, Inc.AI match · 99%

Lobbying · 2025: $320K; 8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $1.1M; $1.1M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

2023$320K
8 reports
2024$320K
8 reports
2025$320K
8 reports
2026$170K
4 reports

Top issues

Homeland security28 reports
Defense23 reports
Budget and appropriations14 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. SENATE21 reports
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES20 reports
Army - Dept of (Other)13 reports
White House Office2 reports
Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$420K
14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 4213 · Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 20261 report
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025

1 of 28 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.