Federal contractor · SACRAMENTO, CA

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT received $163.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+7.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.4M. Its largest customer was Bureau of the Fiscal Service ($120.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$163.9K
New awards
4
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UPBTCLRN9KS5
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 102KFY2017
  2. 86.8KFY2018
  3. 385KFY2019
  4. 2MFY2020
  5. 143.1KFY2021
  6. 131KFY2022
  7. 140.1KFY2023
  8. 147KFY2024
  9. 152.9KFY2025
  10. 163.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$123.5K75%
  2. IT & telecom$40.3K25%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $163.9K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $163.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Sacramento County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 29, 2020 – Aug 3, 2026· 20346421P00002
  2. Bureau of Reclamation· Sacramento County, CA· IT & telecom· Jun 30, 2022 – Jun 23, 2026· 140R2022P0077
  3. Bureau of Reclamation· Sacramento County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 12, 2021 – Jun 4, 2026· 140R2021C0003
  4. Defense Microelectronics Activity· Sacramento County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 29, 2020 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ072721C0001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT received -$121.1K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 3 actions (0 new awards), −149% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 81.041 · State Energy Program (-$121.1K).

Assistance · FY2026
-$121.1K
New awards
0
Actions
3
Since FY2021
$53.1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2021
  2. 53MFY2024
  3. 249.5KFY2025
  4. -121.1KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants-$121.1K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 81.041 · State Energy Program-$121.1K0.0%

Largest awards

  1. 81.254 · Grid Infrastructure Deployment and Resilience· Department of Energy· Project grant· Sep 30, 2024 – Apr 8, 2026· DEGD0000902
  2. 81.041 · State Energy Program· Department of Energy· Project grant· Sep 26, 2024 – Aug 19, 2026· DESE0000737

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $25.5M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION$25.5M99.7%
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward
  2. SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $4.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $25.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $33.5M reported

  1. ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION$25.5M
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward
  2. MATHER, CA · 17 subawards
  3. SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

This section could not be loaded right now. Reload the page to try again.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Sacramento Municipal Utility DistrictAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$360K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.2M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$280K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$360K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$360K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$180K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Energy and nuclear14 reports
  2. Environment and Superfund12 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations11 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MEGUIRE WHITNEY$1.2M
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.