Federal contractor · SAN RAFAEL, CA

SAN RAFAEL ROCK QUARRY, INC.

SAN RAFAEL ROCK QUARRY, INC. received $140.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−96% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $82.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($140.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$140.6K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
PH56DGH9LEF3
Parent company
THE DUTRA GROUP
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE DUTRA GROUP company family: 3 registered entities, $78.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. THE DUTRA GROUPSAN RAFAEL, CA · Family page
    $78M
  2. DUTRA DREDGING COMPANYSAN RAFAEL, CA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 73.9MFY2023
  2. 4.8MFY2024
  3. 3.5MFY2025
  4. 140.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$140.6K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$140.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Sacramento County, CA$140.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $140.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $140.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SAC RIVER EROSION, CONTRACT 2$82.3M
    Department of the Army· Sacramento County, CA· Construction & real property· Feb 28, 2023 – Oct 9, 2025· W9123823C0007

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $5.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1.9M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $39.9K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

104 companies · $116.6M reported

  1. RYZHKA INTERNATIONAL LLC$23.2M
    FORT LAUDERDALE, FL · 25 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. WEEKS MARINE, INC.$21.2M
    COVINGTON, LA · 2 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. YAYPEN SUPPLY, LLC$14.4M
    HOLLYWOOD, FL · 17 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2.1M reported

  1. MANSON CONSTRUCTION CO$2.1M
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FORGEN-ODIN JV$238.7M+487% in FY2026
    ROSEVILLE, CA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. NORFOLK DREDGING COMPANY$292.6M−33% in FY2026
    CHESAPEAKE, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. C. J. MAHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC$329.7M+247% in FY2026
    URBANCREST, OH · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.