Federal contractor · BISMARCK, ND

SANFORD BISMARCK

SANFORD BISMARCK received $22.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−90% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.3M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($31.8K). It also received $738.2K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$22.4K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GYX2L5Q1M5U9
Parent company
SANFORD HEALTH
Other than small businessNonprofit

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SANFORD RESEARCH company family: 6 registered entities, $1.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SANFORD RESEARCHSIOUX FALLS, SD · Family page
    $894.1K
  2. $213.4K
  3. SANFORD HEALTHSIOUX FALLS, SD
    $34.5K
  4. SANFORD HEALTH NETWORKCHAMBERLAIN, SD
    $0
  5. SANFORD MEDICAL CENTERSIOUX FALLS, SD
    -$82.7K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 42.5KFY2017
  2. 73.5KFY2018
  3. 69.1KFY2019
  4. 114.1KFY2020
  5. 177.6KFY2021
  6. 184.6KFY2022
  7. 200.5KFY2023
  8. 204.7KFY2024
  9. 215.3KFY2025
  10. 22.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$22.4K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$7,438
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$7,438
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Burleigh County, ND· Health & medical· Jun 27, 2025 – Jun 16, 2026· 89503425PWA002062
  2. Indian Health Service· Sioux County, ND· Health & medical· Feb 27, 2020 – Jun 25, 2026· 75H70620F03005
  3. Indian Health Service· Sioux County, ND· Health & medical· Feb 28, 2017 – Jan 7, 2026· HHSI241201700234P

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SANFORD BISMARCK received $738.2K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 4 actions (0 new awards), +2.6% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.243 · Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance ($738.2K).

Assistance · FY2026
$738.2K
New awards
0
Actions
4
Since FY2023
$2.9M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 727.2KFY2023
  2. 701KFY2024
  3. 719.3KFY2025
  4. 738.2KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$738.2K100%

Top programs

  1. 93.243 · Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance$738.2K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. 93.243 · Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance· Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration· Project grant· Sep 8, 2023 – Jul 17, 2026· H79SM088559

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2023–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $60.2K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. GRAND FORKS, ND · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $8.9M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. BISMARCK, ND · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $126.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $442.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $47K received
  • FY2025: $180K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $60.2K paid out · $8.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

33 companies · $3.7M reported

  1. VERMILLION, SD · 4 subawards
  2. BROOKINGS, SD · 6 subawards
  3. FARGO, ND · 3 subawards

Primes that pay it

22 companies · $51.7M reported

  1. PIERRE, SD · 91 subawards
  2. BISMARCK, ND · 2 subawards
  3. PIERRE, SD · 12 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GAITHERSBURG, MD · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. ANCHORAGE, AK · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. IDEXX DISTRIBUTION, INC$4M+19% in FY2026
    WESTBROOK, ME · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SANFORD RESEARCH (6 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Sanford HealthAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$720K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.5M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$720K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$720K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$720K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$360K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Medicare and Medicaid28 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  3. Health issues14 reports
  4. Immigration14 reports
  5. Medical and disease research, clinical labs9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BOCKORNY GROUP, INC.$1.4M
    14 reports
  2. Chamber Hill Strategies$1.1M
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.