Federal contractor · CARY, NC

SAS INSTITUTE INC

SAS INSTITUTE INC received -$49.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−101% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $30.4M. Its largest customer was Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ($203.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$49.1K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
RFLNANKKZYV5
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, -$49.1K in FY2026 together.

  1. SAS INSTITUTE INCCARY, NC · Family page
    -$49.1K
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.1MFY2017
  2. 3MFY2018
  3. 2.7MFY2019
  4. 2.7MFY2020
  5. 2.9MFY2021
  6. 3.8MFY2022
  7. 3.4MFY2023
  8. 4.4MFY2024
  9. 4.5MFY2025
  10. -49.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$203.5K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Wake County, NC$203.5K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. International Trade Commission · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Information Systems Agency· Cumberland County, PA· IT & telecom· Sep 21, 2023 – Nov 10, 2025· HC102823P0086
  2. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency· Wake County, NC· Professional services· Mar 15, 2024 – Jan 30, 2026· 2031JW24C00010
  3. SAS---$43K
    International Trade Commission· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jul 16, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026· 34300026P0018

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $673K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $8.5M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COLUMBIA, MD · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Software publishers
  2. RHODES COMPUTER SERVICES, LLC$15.1M−1.5% in FY2026
    EVANS, GA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Software publishers
  3. PERSONABLE.COM, INC.$14.2M+28% in FY2026
    FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SAS INSTITUTE INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • SAS INSTITUTEAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.7M
17 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$6.2M
$6.2M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.1M
    21 reports
  2. 2024$1.5M
    13 reports
  3. 2025$1.7M
    17 reports
  4. 2026$930K
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Science and technology25 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations16 reports
  3. Defense14 reports
  4. Disaster planning and emergencies9 reports
  5. Agriculture8 reports
  6. Health issues8 reports
  7. Homeland security7 reports
  8. Computer industry5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE32 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES30 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS$660K
    6 reports
  2. Caprock Strategies, LLC$220K
    8 reports
  3. CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC$200K
    2 reports
  4. The Russell Group, Inc.$160K
    4 reports
  5. BALLARD PARTNERS$150K
    6 reports
  6. BGR Government Affairs$120K
    14 reports
  7. Manning Fulton & Skinner, P.A.$40K
    4 reports
  8. PRASAM$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.