Federal contractor · ORLANDO, FL

SCHENKEL & SHULTZ, INC.

SCHENKEL & SHULTZ, INC. received $191.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−86% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($191.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$191.8K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
64%
UEI
FKGPS77CCRF6
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.1MFY2017
  2. 724KFY2018
  3. 85.4KFY2019
  4. 1.2MFY2020
  5. -254.4KFY2021
  6. 790.5KFY2022
  7. 3.3MFY2023
  8. 4.2MFY2024
  9. 1.4MFY2025
  10. 191.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$191.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. 72$106.4K56%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition64%
    US 39% · $122.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions64%
    US 8.7% · $122.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Jan 15, 2025 – May 6, 2026· W9123625F0012
  2. Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· Construction & real property· May 12, 2023 – Mar 13, 2026· W9123623F0034
  3. Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· W9123624F0065
  4. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· Construction & real property· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· W9123626FA038

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NASHVILLE, TN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. KENALL-FSC JV$5.6M−30% in FY2026
    OVERLAND PARK, KS · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.