Federal contractor · NEW YORK, NY

SCHOLASTIC INC

SCHOLASTIC INC received $25K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−84% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6M. Its largest customer was Department of State ($25K).

Obligations · FY2026
$25K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
FE4KMH1UYNK3
Parent company
SCHOLASTIC CORPORATION
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $25K in FY2026 together.

  1. SCHOLASTIC INCNEW YORK, NY · Family page
    $25K
  2. LEARNING OVATIONS INCIRVINE, CA
    $0
  3. SCHOLASTIC CORPORATIONNEW YORK, NY
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 681.1KFY2017
  2. 826KFY2018
  3. 1.2MFY2019
  4. 1.2MFY2020
  5. 1.3MFY2021
  6. 53.8KFY2022
  7. 261.6KFY2023
  8. 223.2KFY2024
  9. 158.1KFY2025
  10. 25KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of State$25K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$25K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$25K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $25K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $25K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE REQUIREMENT IS TO PROVIDE ENTERPRISE-WIDE ACCESS VIA IP-AUTHENTICATION TO BOOKFLIX FROM SCHOLASTIC AT A TOTAL COST OF $24,999 FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, SEPTEMBER 13, 2026 TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2027$25K
    Department of State· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 8, 2026 – Jul 8, 2026· 19PCRD26KE003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $165.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $583.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $11.5M reported

  1. DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL$10.8M
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward
  2. STATE OF MARYLAND$583.9K
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 2 subawards
  3. ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C.$165.8K
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AUGUSTINE ANGELS LLC$207.4K
    BEAR, DE · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Educational support services
  2. PINGORA CONSULTING, LLC$208K+40% in FY2026
    LANDER, WY · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Educational support services
  3. READER TO READER, INC.$177.5K−48% in FY2026
    AMHERST, MA · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Educational support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SCHOLASTIC INC (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Scholastic, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$49.1K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$49.1K
$49.1K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$0
    5 reports
  2. 2024$0
    4 reports
  3. 2025$49.1K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$0
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Postal2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. K&L GATES LLP$70K
    6 reports
  2. Liz Robbins Associates$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.