Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

SCICRUNCH

SCICRUNCH received $395K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.5M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($395K).

Obligations · FY2026
$395K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
W35FCSLZJQR6
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 144.2KFY2017
  2. 140.2KFY2018
  3. 140.2KFY2019
  4. 140.2KFY2020
  5. 300KFY2021
  6. 299.6KFY2022
  7. 300KFY2023
  8. 300KFY2024
  9. 300KFY2025
  10. 395KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Institutes of Health$395K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$395K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Diego County, CA$395K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $395K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $395K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. OD: SERVICE: SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF IDENTIFIERS FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES TO SERVE REPLICABLE, REPRODUCIBLE AND GENERALIZABLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH - SEVERABLE$395K
    National Institutes of Health· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Jun 15, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· 75N98026P00729

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SCICRUNCH received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. -487.3FY2022

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2022.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $64.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL$64.1K100%
    WORCESTER, MA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $64.1K reported

  1. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL$64.1K
    WORCESTER, MA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BIOLOGICS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.$1.1M+170% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$1.1M+1.9% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 2 entities · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BLUE CARDINAL LLC$810.7K
    NORRISTOWN, PA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.