Federal contractor · SEYMOUR, MO

SDJV

SDJV received $390.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−85% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $19.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($390.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$390.1K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HT22U7GRFGG1
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.9MFY2023
  2. 13.4MFY2024
  3. 2.6MFY2025
  4. 390.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$385.2K99%
  2. Construction & real property$4,9551.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 4, 2024 – Nov 24, 2025· W9124L24F0030
  2. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 9, 2024 – Feb 19, 2026· W9124L24F0028
  3. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Construction & real property· Sep 3, 2025 – Jan 30, 2026· W911S725FA294
  4. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 2, 2026· W911S726FA164
  5. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Facilities & utilities· May 19, 2026 – May 19, 2026· W911S726FA154
  6. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2025 – Feb 23, 2026· W911S725FA319

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MARCO-ONOPA JV II LLC$15.8M−39% in FY2026
    EL PASO, TX · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. CHEMTRACK/CORNERSTONE JV III, LLC$15.8M−98% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. SHEFFIELD CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C.$16.1M−100% in FY2026
    LAWTON, OK · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.