Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

SENTAR, INC.

SENTAR, INC. received $19.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−49% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $326.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($19.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$19.1M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
4.0%
UEI
J7NJG4KDP7U3
Parent company
SENTAR INC.
Other than small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14.8MFY2017
  2. 22MFY2018
  3. 37.5MFY2019
  4. 44.5MFY2020
  5. 35.5MFY2021
  6. 33.8MFY2022
  7. 43.1MFY2023
  8. 38.5MFY2024
  9. 37.6MFY2025
  10. 19.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$19.1M100.0%
    5 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$18.8M99%
  2. Research & development$258.3K1.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Berkeley County, SC$18.3M96%
  2. Madison County, AL$756.6K4.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition4.0%
    US 39% · $756.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions4.0%
    US 8.8% · $756.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SEE GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION.$131.4M
    Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· IT & telecom· Sep 27, 2019 – Mar 12, 2026· N6523619F3503
  2. PROVIDE RISK MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT FOR DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY (DHA) CYBERSECURITY.$83.5M
    Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· May 23, 2024 – Jun 4, 2026· N6523624F3022
  3. SERVICES IAW SOW - VH-92 CAMEO PROGRAM$2.9M
    Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Mar 31, 2022 – Apr 28, 2026· N6600122F0541
  4. ENGINEERING SERVICES$751.4K
    Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Feb 2, 2024 – Jan 27, 2026· N6600124F0221
  5. 873AUTHORITY$140K
    Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jul 23, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025· N6426725C7456
  6. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FE886

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SENTAR, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 199.9KFY2023

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2023.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $8.9M (6 subawards)

5 primes

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$8.3M93%
    ROY, UT · 2 subawards
  2. CSA GLOBAL LLC$240.3K2.7%
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward
  3. ASRC PRIME CONSTRUCTORS, LLC$229.3K2.6%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward
  4. ASRC BUILDERS-CADDELL, LLC$87.3K1.0%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward
  5. ASRC BUILDERS, LLC$36.1K0.4%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $31.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $27.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $9.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $22.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $8.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

17 companies · $102.9M reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$45.5M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 14 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$17.1M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 32 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$12.2M
    MCLEAN, VA · 12 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.$102.3M−9.2% in FY2026
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BLACK & VEATCH-JACOBS JV$87.7M+111% in FY2026
    LEAWOOD, KS · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GREEN EXPERT TECHNOLOGY INC$88.2M−20% in FY2026
    HADDONFIELD, NJ · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.