Federal contractor · CHARLESTON, SC

SERES-ARCADIS SB JV2 LLC

SERES-ARCADIS SB JV2 LLC received $3.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−54% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $44.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.3M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
2.6%
UEI
HJK8MRQX25B1
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1KFY2021
  2. 24MFY2022
  3. 1.5MFY2023
  4. 8.2MFY2024
  5. 7.1MFY2025
  6. 3.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.9M58%
  2. Construction & real property$1.4M42%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.6%
    US 39% · $86.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions2.6%
    US 8.7% · $86.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Jefferson County, NY· Facilities & utilities· Feb 3, 2022 – Apr 9, 2026· W912DR22C0006
  2. Department of the Army· Philadelphia County, PA· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2024 – Jun 5, 2026· W912BU24F0048
  3. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, PA· Construction & real property· Jan 14, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· W912BU26FA003
  4. Department of the Army· Calvert County, MD· Construction & real property· Jun 28, 2024 – Dec 23, 2025· W912DR24F0229
  5. Department of the Army· Berkeley County, SC· Construction & real property· Dec 10, 2024 – Jan 22, 2026· W912BU25F0005
  6. Department of the Army· Jefferson County, NY· Construction & real property· Sep 18, 2024 – May 20, 2026· W912DR24F0359
  7. Department of the Army· Charles County, MD· Construction & real property· Sep 28, 2024 – Mar 27, 2026· W9127824F0399

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $970.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $220.1K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $1.2M reported

  1. EAST SYRACUSE, NY · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. MADISON, WI · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CASCADE REMEDIATION SERVICES LLC$210.9K
    MEDFORD, NJ · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CLIFTON, VA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. AEROSTAR ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC$19.3M−95% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 2 entities · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. GEO CONSULTANTS CORPORATION$16.3M−97% in FY2026
    KEVIL, KY · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.