Federal contractor · SANTA CLARA, CA

SERVICENOW, INC.

SERVICENOW, INC. received $749.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (0% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.5M. Its largest customer was Smithsonian Institution ($749.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$749.1K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RRACXPKQJ918
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.2KFY2017
  2. -19.4KFY2018
  3. 531KFY2020
  4. 456.8KFY2021
  5. 505.6KFY2022
  6. 749.1KFY2023
  7. 749.1KFY2024
  8. 749.1KFY2025
  9. 749.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Smithsonian Institution$749.1K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$749.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Santa Clara County, CA$749.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $749.1K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $749.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SOFTWARE LICENSE RENEWAL$3M
    Smithsonian Institution· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Jul 28, 2023 – Jul 16, 2026· 33314523P00496079

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $10.1M reported

  1. DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP$4.1M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION$3.6M
    BETHESDA, MD · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$1.7M
    GROTON, CT · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UNITED DEVELOPMENT USA INC$1.9M−88% in FY2026
    SILVER SPRING, MD · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Computer systems design and related services
  2. KAPSTONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$2.8M−13% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CLC CABLING SERVICE, INC.$3M−11% in FY2026
    MARKLEYSBURG, PA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Service NowAI match · 100%
  • SERVICENOW, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.6M
18 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$6.6M
$6.6M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$3M
    25 reports
  2. 2024$1.4M
    22 reports
  3. 2025$1.6M
    18 reports
  4. 2026$600K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations42 reports
  2. Science and technology27 reports
  3. Computer industry14 reports
  4. Telecommunications11 reports
  5. Health issues8 reports
  6. Defense5 reports
  7. Government issues5 reports
  8. Veterans5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES61 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE53 reports
  3. Executive Office of the President (EOP)9 reports
  4. Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)8 reports
  5. White House Office5 reports
  6. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)3 reports
  7. Natl Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST)3 reports
  8. Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Avoq, LLC$670K
    12 reports
  2. VantageKnight LLC$640K
    10 reports
  3. The Raben Group$560K
    11 reports
  4. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$440K
    8 reports
  5. MARBLE ARCH$170K
    4 reports
  6. BALLARD PARTNERS$160K
    2 reports
  7. LAW OFFICES OF FREDERICK H. GRAEFE, PLLC$100K
    6 reports
  8. Van Scoyoc Associates$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.