Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
SES TECHNOLOGIES LLC
SES TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $379.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−97% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $25.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($379.8K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $379.8K
- New awards
- 3
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- DDFBDLJB2PJ5
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $367.8K in FY2026 together.
- SES TECHNOLOGIES LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page$379.8K
- SES TECHNOLOGIES LLCWENATCHEE, WA$0
- SES TECHNOLOGIES LLCMERRITT ISLAND, FL$0
- SES TECHNOLOGIES LLCESCONDIDO, CA-$11.9K
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 5.2MFY2021
- 425.5KFY2022
- 6.5MFY2024
- 12.7MFY2025
- 379.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$379.8K100%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$270.5K71%
- Equipment maintenance$109.3K29%
Where the work was performed
- Bexar County, TX$259.2K68%
- Leavenworth County, KS$109.3K29%
- Pierce County, WA$11.3K3.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $379.8K
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $379.8K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Pierce County, WA· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2025 – May 19, 2026· W912DY25CA031
- Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2024 – Apr 30, 2026· W912DY24C0076
- Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Equipment maintenance· Sep 30, 2024 – Feb 4, 2026· W912DQ24C4047
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- JULIUS KAAZ CONSTRUCTION CO INC$16.4M−43% in FY2026LEAVENWORTH, KS · 2 entities · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Building equipment contractorsArmy · Highway, street, and bridge construction
- PATRICK CONSTRUCTORS, LLC$13.9M−91% in FY2026FAIRBANKS, AK · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Building equipment contractorsArmy · Nonresidential building construction
- RANGE CONSTRUCTION LLC$12.3M+19% in FY2026WASHINGTON, DC · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Highway, street, and bridge constructionArmy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Building equipment contractors
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.