Federal contractor · WHEELING, IL

SET ENVIRONMENTAL INC

SET ENVIRONMENTAL INC received $163K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.8M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($138.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$163K
New awards
11
Sole-source
2.8%
Single offer
12%
UEI
E47KTEVT5JV3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 311.1KFY2017
  2. 101.9KFY2018
  3. 133.7KFY2019
  4. 135.3KFY2020
  5. 310.5KFY2021
  6. 191.8KFY2022
  7. 200.6KFY2023
  8. 100.2KFY2024
  9. 189.6KFY2025
  10. 163KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$163K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition15%
    US 39% · $24.5K
  • Sole-source awards2.8%
    US 30% · $4,546
  • Single-offer competitions12%
    US 8.8% · $20K
  • Urgency justifications2.8%
    US 5.1% · $4,546

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Nov 24, 2025 – Nov 24, 2025· 6973GH26F00105
  2. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Feb 24, 2026 – Feb 24, 2026· 6973GH26F00475
  3. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Jul 27, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026· 6973GH26F01166
  4. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· 6973GH26F00755
  5. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Aug 21, 2025 – Nov 17, 2025· 6973GH25F01283
  6. Federal Prison Industries / Unicor· Bastrop County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 15UBAS26P00000977
  7. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 2, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 6973GH26F01357
  8. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· 6973GH26F00708

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $224.1K reported

  1. WEST CHESTER, PA · 3 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ROCKPORT, TX · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. REDD EXCAVATION LLC$75.5K−100% in FY2026
    BENTON, IL · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. NEXT LEVEL RESTORATION, INC.$83.5K−94% in FY2026
    MIAMI, FL · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.