Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ
SEVENTH EMERGENCE SOLUTIONS, LLC
SEVENTH EMERGENCE SOLUTIONS, LLC received $7.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $24.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.3M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $7.7M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- G2CHH73KX5G2
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.1MFY2023
- 4.5MFY2024
- 11.5MFY2025
- 7.7MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$7.3M96%3 awards
- Defense Information Systems Agency$271.5K3.5%1 awards
- Washington Headquarters Services$46.6K0.6%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$5M65%
- Professional services$2.7M35%
Where the work was performed
- El Paso County, TX$4M53%
- Maricopa County, AZ$3M39%
- Leavenworth County, KS$614K8.0%
- District of Columbia, DC$46.6K0.6%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $7.7M
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $7.7M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· El Paso County, TX· IT & telecom· Oct 30, 2024 – Jan 13, 2026· W912DY25C0004
- Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Apr 10, 2026 – May 12, 2026· W911NF26FA014
- Washington Headquarters Services· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2023 – Mar 2, 2026· HQ003423C0137
- Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· IT & telecom· Mar 27, 2025 – May 13, 2026· W91RUS25CA014
- Defense Information Systems Agency· Maricopa County, AZ· IT & telecom· Aug 26, 2024 – Apr 28, 2026· HC104724C0007
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
2 companies · $169.8K reported
- 9 BEST ASSOCIATES, LLC$116.7KCHELTENHAM, MD · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- CHICKASHA, OK · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- CKA, LLC$18.2M−98% in FY2026GAITHERSBURG, MD · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- B&T TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, G.P.$20.1M−92% in FY2026HUNTSVILLE, AL · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- ITES VENTURE LLC$17.2M−84% in FY2026FAIRFAX, VA · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.