Federal contractor · FOSTER, OK

SHARON RIDDLE

SHARON RIDDLE received $302.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.3M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($302.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$302.2K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
QS6SCJUAQB45
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 589.4KFY2017
  2. 608.8KFY2018
  3. 639.8KFY2019
  4. 617.8KFY2020
  5. 652.5KFY2021
  6. 594.6KFY2022
  7. 1.3MFY2023
  8. 296.4KFY2024
  9. 644.7KFY2025
  10. 302.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Land Management$302.2K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$302.2K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Stephens County, OK$302.2K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$22.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$22.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SHARON RIDDLE -OFF-RANGE PASTURE (ORP) INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) TASK ORDER (TO)$969.7K
    Bureau of Land Management· Stephens County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2025 – Jul 28, 2026· 140L0125F0048
  2. SHARON RIDDLE- OFF RANGE PASTURE (ORP) INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ)$640.5K
    Bureau of Land Management· Stephens County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2023 – May 14, 2026· 140L0123F0168
  3. SHARON RIDDLE - OFF RANGE PASTURE (ORP) TASK ORDER (TO)$302.9K
    Bureau of Land Management· Stephens County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 24, 2024 – May 14, 2026· 140L0124F0123

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THORESON RANCH INC$1.2M+254% in FY2026
    EL DORADO SPRINGS, MO · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for animal production
  2. COBBS RANCH, LLC$1.2M+7,606% in FY2026
    RAMONA, OK · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for animal production
  3. SILER CATTLE COMPANY LLC$1.2M+1.3% in FY2026
    VINITA, OK · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for animal production

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.