Federal contractor · HOOD RIVER, OR

SHIP INTERIOR SYSTEMS, LLC

SHIP INTERIOR SYSTEMS, LLC received $89.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−88% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6M. Its largest customer was National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($89.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$89.7K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UZNGFGAFDJ75
Parent company
SHIP INTERIOR SYSTEMS, LLC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 35.3KFY2017
  2. 38.5KFY2018
  3. 36.2KFY2019
  4. 53.9KFY2020
  5. 28.3KFY2021
  6. 27.7KFY2022
  7. 19.1KFY2023
  8. 515.1KFY2024
  9. 760.8KFY2025
  10. 89.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration$89.7K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$89.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Hood River County, OR$89.7K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. REPLACEMENT JOINER PANELS FOR NOAA SHIP OSCAR DYSON IN KETCHIKAN, AK.$89.7K
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Hood River County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 21, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026· 1333MK26P0111

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRADEN SHIELDING SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION, INC.$1.3M−100% in FY2026
    TULSA, OK · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural and structural metals manufacturing
  2. TRUE MACHINE CO.$630.2K−41% in FY2026
    SWANSEA, MA · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural and structural metals manufacturing
  3. BELL TOWER CORPORATION, INC.$698.7K
    CHELSEA, OK · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural and structural metals manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.