Federal contractor · BEAVERCREEK TOWNSHIP, OH

SIERTEK, LTD.

SIERTEK, LTD. received $13.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 43 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $149.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($13.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.9M
New awards
43
Sole-source
30%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JCTAHNC3FQ86
Parent company
SIERTEK, LTD.
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 473.8KFY2017
  2. 11.5MFY2018
  3. 17.9MFY2019
  4. 16.4MFY2020
  5. 23.9MFY2021
  6. 22.7MFY2022
  7. 13.6MFY2023
  8. 9.5MFY2024
  9. 19.7MFY2025
  10. 13.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 42 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$11.2M81%
  2. IT & telecom$2.6M19%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bexar County, TX$772.6K5.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition30%
    US 39% · $4.2M
  • Sole-source awards30%
    US 30% · $4.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$17K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Apr 21, 2023 – Apr 28, 2026· FA239623F0104
  2. Department of the Air Force· Clark County, NV· Professional services· Mar 23, 2025 – Apr 24, 2026· FA486125F0073
  3. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· IT & telecom· Nov 15, 2023 – May 15, 2026· FA239624PB001
  4. Department of the Air Force· Bossier Parish, LA· Professional services· Apr 22, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· FA680026F0003
  5. Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Professional services· Nov 5, 2020 – Feb 24, 2026· FA822421F0017
  6. Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Professional services· May 9, 2019 – Feb 24, 2026· FA822419FA139
  7. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Feb 27, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· FA863025CB012
  8. Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Professional services· Nov 8, 2022 – Jan 5, 2026· FA822423F0016

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $133.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2.2M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. XRDEFENSE, LLC$18.3M−27% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. REMOTELY PILOTED SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.$15.1M−100% in FY2026
    ADDISON, TX · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.