Federal contractor · THEODORE, AL
SILVER SHIPS, INC
SILVER SHIPS, INC received $13M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $179M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($10.9M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $13M
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.1%
- Single offer
- 52%
- UEI
- FQX1AMM39BH6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 12.9MFY2017
- 675.2KFY2018
- 14.6MFY2019
- 24.4MFY2020
- 15.2MFY2021
- 8.9MFY2022
- 41.3MFY2023
- 21.4MFY2024
- 26.6MFY2025
- 13MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$10.9M83%2 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard$1.7M13%1 awards
- National Park Service$513.4K3.9%2 awards
- Department of the Army$11.7K0.1%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$13M99.9%
- Equipment maintenance$11.7K0.1%
Where the work was performed
- Mobile County, AL$12.7M97%
- Suffolk County, NY$363.4K2.8%
- Jefferson County, AR$11.7K0.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition52%US 39% · $6.8M
- Sole-source awards0.1%US 30% · $11.7K
- Single-offer competitions52%US 8.7% · $6.7M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Army$11.7KDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 1, 2023 – Feb 13, 2026· N0002423F2201
- Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 23, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· N0002426F22A1
- U.S. Coast Guard· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026· 70Z02326F92200026
- Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 26, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· W51H7225FA016
- National Park Service· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 140P4526F0025
- National Park Service· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· 140P5226F0004
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, AR· Equipment maintenance· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· W9127S26PA055
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $57.9K reported
- VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TECNICO CORPORATION$64.3M−51% in FY2026CHESAPEAKE, VA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingU.S. Coast Guard · Ship and boat building
- MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD$53.8M−100% in FY2026YOKOHAMA, JPN · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building
- ERIE FORGE & STEEL INC$51.1MERIE, PA · 2 entities · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.