Federal contractor · SUGAR HILL, GA

SJ TECH LLC

SJ TECH LLC received $698.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−65% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $124M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($478.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$698.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
J7NAPEL7Z7F9
Small businessWoman-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 13.3MFY2017
  2. 12.7MFY2018
  3. 21.7MFY2019
  4. 25.4MFY2020
  5. 16.8MFY2021
  6. 13.8MFY2022
  7. 12.1MFY2023
  8. 5.5MFY2024
  9. 2MFY2025
  10. 698.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$698.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $698.9K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $698.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Dec 14, 2021 – Mar 27, 2026· N0018922P0023
  2. Department of the Air Force· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Aug 4, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· FA701425F0232
  3. Defense Health Agency· Frederick County, MD· Professional services· Sep 28, 2020 – Mar 31, 2026· W81XWH20C0143

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $290.3K paid out · $443.9K received
  • FY2022: $489.2K paid out · $28.4M received
  • FY2023: $664.9K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $1.4M reported

  1. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 11 subawards · Employment services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $28.8M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. PAVCON LLC$443.9K
    LATROBE, PA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HERNDON, VA · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. LUNATEK, LLC$8.2M−44% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.