Federal contractor · RIVERSIDE, CA

SKANSKA USA CIVIL WEST CALIFORNIA DISTRICT INC.

SKANSKA USA CIVIL WEST CALIFORNIA DISTRICT INC. received $14.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $68.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($14.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.8K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CB4NJUHL5588
Parent company
SKANSKA AB
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SKANSKA USA CIVIL NORTHEAST INC company family: 9 registered entities, $2.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SKANSKA USA CIVIL NORTHEAST INCEAST ELMHURST, NY · Family page
    $2.2M
  2. SKANSKA USA BUILDING INCSAN ANTONIO, TX
    $103.9K
  3. SKANSKA KOCH INCCARTERET, NJ
    $0
  4. SKANSKA USA BUILDING INCROCKVILLE, MD
    $0
  5. SKANSKA USA BUILDING INC.NEW YORK, NY
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 36MFY2022
  2. 332.1KFY2023
  3. 965.8KFY2024
  4. 30.8MFY2025
  5. 14.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$14.8K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$14.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Riverside County, CA$14.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DEWATERING DIVERSON AND CONTROL OF WATER$68.1M
    Department of the Army· Riverside County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 6, 2022 – Feb 18, 2026· W912PL22C0016

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $156.7M reported

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$156.7M
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HAWAII HARBORS CONSTRUCTORS JV$197.7M−55% in FY2026
    AIEA, HI · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. RQ-MAGANN JV$104.8M−65% in FY2026
    CARLSBAD, CA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. REYES CONSTRUCTION, INC.$120M−99% in FY2026
    POMONA, CA · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.