Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

SMITHGROUP, INC.

SMITHGROUP, INC. received $694.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−91% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $63.8M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($599.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$694.4K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
XJMEPMJRGJD7
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SMITHGROUP, INC. company family: 4 registered entities, $9.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SMITHGROUP, INC.WASHINGTON, DC · Family page
    $9.1M
  2. SMITHGROUP, INC.DETROIT, MI
    $0
  3. SMITHGROUP, INC.SAN FRANCISCO, CA
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11.9KFY2017
  2. -18.9KFY2020
  3. 5.1MFY2021
  4. 46.5KFY2022
  5. 172.2KFY2023
  6. 50.2MFY2024
  7. 7.7MFY2025
  8. 694.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$694.4K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Indian Health Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Feb 2, 2024 – Jan 7, 2026· 75H70124C00011
  2. Public Buildings Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· May 28, 2021 – Jul 23, 2026· 47PJ0021C0035

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $66.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $66.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $2M reported

  1. E & D ENGINEERING, INC$1.2M
    GRAND BLANC, MI · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SERCO INC$521.6K
    HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $132.1K reported

  1. LITTLE ROCK, AR · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. APSI CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT$31.1M+392% in FY2026
    IRVINE, CA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DATTNER ARCHITECTS DPC$30.7M−45% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. PORTLAND, OR · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.