Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ
SMITHGROUP, INC.
SMITHGROUP, INC. received $694.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−91% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $63.8M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($599.2K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $694.4K
- New awards
- 2
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- XJMEPMJRGJD7
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the SMITHGROUP, INC. company family: 4 registered entities, $9.8M in FY2026 together. See the family
- SMITHGROUP, INC.WASHINGTON, DC · Family page$9.1M
- SMITHGROUP, INC.DETROIT, MI$0
- SMITHGROUP, INC.SAN FRANCISCO, CA$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 11.9KFY2017
- -18.9KFY2020
- 5.1MFY2021
- 46.5KFY2022
- 172.2KFY2023
- 50.2MFY2024
- 7.7MFY2025
- 694.4KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Indian Health Service$599.2K86%1 awards
- Public Buildings Service$95.2K14%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$694.4K100%
Where the work was performed
- Maricopa County, AZ$694.4K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Indian Health Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Feb 2, 2024 – Jan 7, 2026· 75H70124C00011
- Public Buildings Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· May 28, 2021 – Jul 23, 2026· 47PJ0021C0035
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $66.1K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $66.1K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
5 companies · $2M reported
- E & D ENGINEERING, INC$1.2MGRAND BLANC, MI · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- SERCO INC$521.6KHERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- CADD MICROSYSTEMS, INC.$180.4KALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
1 company · $132.1K reported
- CRIME LABORATORY ARKANSAS$132.1KLITTLE ROCK, AR · 2 subawards
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- APSI CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT$31.1M+392% in FY2026IRVINE, CA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- DATTNER ARCHITECTS DPC$30.7M−45% in FY2026NEW YORK, NY · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- ZIMMER GUNSUL FRASCA ARCHITECTS LLP$38M−7.1% in FY2026PORTLAND, OR · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.