Federal contractor · MCLEAN, VA

SMOOTHSTACK, INC

SMOOTHSTACK, INC received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Its largest customer was Departmental Offices ($1.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YEALULA7ZVC5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Departmental Offices$1.1M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.1M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$1.1M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TECHNICAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT & TRAINING - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENGINEER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT$1.1M
    Departmental Offices· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· May 28, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· 2032L226F00064

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $789.7K (3 subawards)

1 prime

  1. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC$789.7K100%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $12.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $12.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $18.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $789.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $50M reported

  1. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC$46.2M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 149 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. LEIDOS, INC.$3.7M
    RESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$67.8K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMS NETWORKS LLC$891K−1.3% in FY2026
    WOODBRIDGE, VA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services
  2. HAVER ANALYTICS INC$2.1M−41% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MALIK CONSULTING, INC.$6.8M
    ATLANTA, GA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • smoothstackAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$0
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$10K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$10K
    2 reports
  2. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Labor - Dept of (DOL)4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Jenkins Hill Consulting, LLC$10K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.