Federal contractor · SAINT IGNATIUS, MT

SNOW EAGLE GROUP, LLC

SNOW EAGLE GROUP, LLC received -$492.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−420% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $14.7M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($288.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$492.4K
New awards
8
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
RZN4KMRUV3J9
Other than small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6MFY2023
  2. 9MFY2024
  3. 154KFY2025
  4. -492.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Coast Guard$288.8K0.0%
    1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$288.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lake County, MT$288.8K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Emergency Management Agency· Lake County, MT· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2023 – Nov 10, 2025· 70FA3123C00000006
  2. Federal Transit Administration· Lake County, MT· Professional services· Sep 23, 2024 – Mar 25, 2026· 69319524F30140N
  3. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Apr 20, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· 69319526F30024N
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Lake County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 8, 2025 – May 26, 2026· 70Z02325FRD000005
  5. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 27, 2023 – Jul 2, 2026· 69319523F30071N
  6. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management· Lake County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Sep 11, 2024 – Aug 27, 2026· 140M0124P0020
  7. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Aug 2, 2023 – Jul 2, 2026· 69319523F30073N
  8. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 22, 2024 – Sep 11, 2026· 69319524F30108N

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $1.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $6M paid out · $351.5K received
  • FY2025: $257.9K paid out · $109.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $7.6M reported

  1. SPRING, TX · 14 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SAINT IGNATIUS, MT · 13 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $460.9K reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ONEGLOBE LLC$3.9M+1.7% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Emergency Management Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  2. WILCO GROUP, LLC$6.1M+62% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Emergency Management Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ISYAK LLC$6.4M−43% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Emergency Management Agency · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.