Federal contractor · FAIRBORN, OH

SOLUTIONS THROUGH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC

SOLUTIONS THROUGH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC received $7.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $436.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.4M
New awards
14
Sole-source
27%
Single offer
7.0%
UEI
N53NQ8HY6P54
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 78.7MFY2017
  2. 111.5MFY2018
  3. 65.8MFY2019
  4. 51.8MFY2020
  5. 52.3MFY2021
  6. 43.2MFY2022
  7. 14MFY2023
  8. 2MFY2024
  9. 10.3MFY2025
  10. 7.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$5M68%
    3 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$2.1M29%
    7 awards
  3. U.S. Coast Guard$417.8K5.7%
    2 awards
  4. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  5. Office of Procurement Operations-$189.5K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$7.2M98%
  2. Research & development$150.5K2.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$2.7M37%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$2.3M31%
  3. Greene County, OH$2.1M29%
  4. Baltimore city, MD$507.6K6.9%
  5. El Paso County, CO$23K0.3%
  6. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition34%
    US 39% · $2.5M
  • Sole-source awards27%
    US 30% · $2M
  • Single-offer competitions7.0%
    US 8.7% · $513.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$2M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. JOINT FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT COMMAND FOR INTEGRATED MISSILE DEFENSE STAFF SUPPORT WITH THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES$20.1M
    Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Aug 20, 2020 – Jun 5, 2026· W9126020F5001
  2. ON-SITE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO ACCOMPLISH TASKS ASSOCIATED WITH JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS), JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL (JROC) SECRETARIAT DUTIES, SUPPORT FOR FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES BOARDS (FCBS).$16.4M
    Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jul 22, 2022 – May 20, 2026· N0018922F3048
  3. PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE JOINT STAFF, ACTIONS DIVISION, CUSTOMER SERVICE BRANCH, ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT BRANCH, AND JOINT STAFF ACTIONS PROCESS-TRAINING PROGRAM.$7.4M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 18, 2023 – Jun 10, 2026· N0018923F3027
  4. PURCHASE CARD SUPPORT SERVICES$6.2M
    U.S. Coast Guard· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 28, 2017 – Jan 22, 2026· HSCG2317FACR001
  5. LAB SUPPORT$2.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Mar 30, 2023 – Nov 18, 2025· FA860623F0003
  6. ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT FOR USSTRATCOM J6E$2.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Sarpy County, NE· Professional services· Jul 13, 2020 – Jan 7, 2026· FA460020F0066
  7. SURFACE FORCES LOGISTICS CENTER (SFLC) PROGRAMMED DEPOT MAINTENANCE (PDM) PORT ENGINEER (PE) AND AVAILABILITY PROJECT MANAGER (APM) TRAINING PROGRAM.$2.6M
    U.S. Coast Guard· Baltimore city, MD· Professional services· May 17, 2022 – Sep 3, 2026· 70Z08022FPBPL0001
  8. AAL TO6$2M
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Mar 19, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· FA860626FB004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $84.1K paid out · $67.8M received
  • FY2022: $1.6M paid out · $36.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $14.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $897.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $1.7M reported

  1. TARGETED APPROACH LLC$908.3K
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PEOPLETEC, INC.$704K
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  3. AEROVIRONMENT, INC$84.1K
    SIMI VALLEY, CA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

15 companies · $127.7M reported

  1. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS JV, LLC$47.4M
    DAYTON, OH · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. EAGLE HARBOR, LLC$32.1M
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. AXIENT LLC$15.1M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LIBERTY JV$19.3M−105% in FY2026
    YUMA, AZ · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ZAPATA GROUP, INC$24.2M−99% in FY2026
    CHARLOTTE, NC · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BLUESTONE INTERSPEC JV, LLC$16.1M−87% in FY2026
    MALVERN, PA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.