Federal contractor · CEDAR CITY, UT

SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. received $36.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (0% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $107.3K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Reclamation ($36.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$36.6K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LCRNK3GZERL1
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 34.1KFY2024
  2. 36.6KFY2025
  3. 36.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Reclamation$36.6K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$36.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Coconino County, AZ$36.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $36.6K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $36.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. GLEN CANYON INTERNET SERVICE$73.2K
    Bureau of Reclamation· Coconino County, AZ· IT & telecom· Sep 3, 2025 – Feb 27, 2026· 140R8125P0080

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 5.9KFY2022
  2. 81.5KFY2023
  3. 106.9KFY2024
  4. 3.8MFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2022–FY2025.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$66.8K0% in FY2026
    SEQUIM, WA · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. NEMONT TELEPHONE CO-OPERATIVE INC$1.2M−25% in FY2026
    SCOBEY, MT · 2 entities · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Wired telecommunications carriers
  3. GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC$44.3M+62% in FY2026
    QUINCY, MA · 2 entities · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Wired telecommunications carriers

Showing the top 3 of 7 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.