Federal contractor · ANDALUSIA, AL

SOUTHEAST ALABAMA GAS DISTRICT, THE

SOUTHEAST ALABAMA GAS DISTRICT, THE received $85.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−9.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($85.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$85.4K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
RF8GMVHK7M73
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 79.4KFY2017
  2. 108.5KFY2018
  3. 103.7KFY2019
  4. 174.8KFY2020
  5. 91.8KFY2021
  6. 107.6KFY2022
  7. 96.9KFY2023
  8. 128.1KFY2024
  9. 94KFY2025
  10. 85.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$85.4K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$85.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Dale County, AL$85.4K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $85.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $85.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 200612!009626!97AS!SP0600!DEFENSE ENERGY SUPPORT CENTER !SP060003C8263 !A!N! !N! !P00021!20060926!20260424!009850058!009850058!009850058!N!SOUTHEAST ALABAMA GAS DISTRICT!715 NORTH BYPASS !ANDALUSIA !AL!36420!27640!031!01!FORT RUCKER !COFFEE !ALABAMA !+000000199088!N!N!000000000000!S111!GAS SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !221210!E! !3!A!S!B! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!B!U!A!1!001!N!1E!C!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !A! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !$5.7M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Dale County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Oct 21, 2016 – May 6, 2026· SP060003C8263

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AVISTA CORPORATION$863.6K+11% in FY2026
    SPOKANE, WA · 2 entities · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Natural gas distribution
  2. CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF$3.4M+25% in FY2026
    CLARKSVILLE, TN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Natural gas distribution
  3. NEW MEXICO GAS COMPANY, INC$12.1M−87% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Natural gas distribution

Showing the top 3 of 8 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.