Federal contractor · CHARLESTON, SC

SOUTHERN DREDGING CO INC

SOUTHERN DREDGING CO INC received $4.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−71% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $181.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($4.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.8M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JXVMX8LB9W17
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 21.1MFY2017
  2. 29.1MFY2018
  3. 27.8MFY2019
  4. 26.1MFY2020
  5. 10.5MFY2021
  6. 20.4MFY2022
  7. 5.7MFY2023
  8. 19.1MFY2024
  9. 16.8MFY2025
  10. 4.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$4.8M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$4.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Charleston County, SC$4M84%
  2. Glynn County, GA$767.1K16%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FY25 CHARLESTON UPPER HARBOR AND JBC OM MAINTENANCE DREDGING$13.4M
    Department of the Army· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Sep 17, 2025 – Feb 11, 2026· W912HP25CA006
  2. FY25 BRUNSWICK INNER HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING$4.1M
    Department of the Army· Glynn County, GA· Construction & real property· Sep 17, 2025 – Apr 1, 2026· W912HN25C5005
  3. FY26 GEORGETOWN HARBOR OM NAVIGATION DREDGING$3.6M
    Department of the Army· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· W912HP26CA006

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MASSMAN CONSTRUCTION CO.$40.2M−26% in FY2026
    OVERLAND PARK, KS · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. J. E. MCAMIS, INC$40M+197% in FY2026
    CHICO, CA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. CARBRO CONSTRUCTORS CORP$39.8M−91% in FY2026
    HILLSBOROUGH, NJ · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.