Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

SPECPRO-BB&E JV, LLC

SPECPRO-BB&E JV, LLC received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−90% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $45.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
5
Sole-source
19%
Single offer
0.1%
UEI
VD9YETZWKW58
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.6MFY2023
  2. 18.2MFY2024
  3. 18.4MFY2025
  4. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.5M81%
  2. Professional services$349.8K19%

Where the work was performed

  1. 72$210K11%
  2. Duval County, FL$137.3K7.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition19%
    US 39% · $349.8K
  • Sole-source awards19%
    US 30% · $347.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.1%
    US 8.8% · $2,500
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Duval County, FL· Professional services· Jul 29, 2024 – Mar 9, 2026· N6945024C0050
  2. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Feb 26, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· FA800326F0004
  3. Department of the Army· Professional services· Jun 9, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· W51DQV26FA019
  4. Department of the Army· Professional services· Nov 4, 2025 – Nov 4, 2025· W51DQV26F0002
  5. Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Jan 21, 2026 – Jan 21, 2026· W912QR26FA059

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $16.4M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $22.4M reported

  1. NORTHVILLE, MI · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LINDE SPECIAL PROJECTS LLC$24.3M−6.2% in FY2026
    NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. IT-OSI-JV, LLC$21.9M+23% in FY2026
    DILLINGHAM, AK · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.