Federal contractor · OAK RIDGE, TN

SPECPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC

SPECPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC received -$2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−114% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $167M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army (-$2.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
-$2.4M
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
NLCRUT3KG9R6
Parent company
BRISTOL BAY NATIVE CORPORATION
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CCI UTILITY AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC company family: 33 registered entities, $276.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CCI UTILITY AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $33.8M
  2. $79.1M
  3. $75.8M
  4. $31.1M
  5. CCI GROUP, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $26.6M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 350.5KFY2017
  2. 18.3MFY2018
  3. 19.4MFY2019
  4. 12.6MFY2020
  5. 25.7MFY2021
  6. 19.4MFY2022
  7. 20.2MFY2023
  8. 35.8MFY2024
  9. 17.7MFY2025
  10. -2.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Anderson County, TN· Construction & real property· Dec 20, 2019 – May 28, 2026· W912DY20F0048
  2. Department of the Army· Nueces County, TX· Construction & real property· Jun 10, 2022 – May 12, 2026· W912DY22F0235
  3. Department of the Army· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2021 – May 29, 2026· W9127S21F6024

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $641.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $137.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

11 companies · $5.9M reported

  1. PHOENIX, AZ · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. PEVELY, MO · 3 subawards · Utility system construction
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Utility system construction

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $3.4M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 32 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. WEST CHESTER, PA · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. BLAIRSVILLE, GA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 36 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KORTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY$554.3M−26% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. WESTON SOLUTIONS INC$1B−46% in FY2026
    WEST CHESTER, PA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Utility system constructionNavy · Utility system construction+2 more
  3. ARCHER WESTERN FEDERAL JV$397.8M−63% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.