Federal contractor · DENVER, CO

STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.

No contract obligations recorded for STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. in FY2026. Since FY2021: $6.7M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
TS2KYRHBKZA3
Parent company
STANTEC CONSULTING MICHIGAN INC.
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. company family: 56 registered entities, $51.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.DENVER, CO · Family page
    $19M
  2. STANTEC-AECOM SIOP JVBURLINGTON, MA
    $9.1M
  3. $7.6M
  4. $3.8M
  5. $3.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.4MFY2021
  2. 1.6MFY2022
  3. 1.6MFY2023
  4. 0FY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $5.9M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$5.9M100%
    DENVER, CO · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $475.6K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $558K paid out · $62.1K received
  • FY2023: $793.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $429.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $5.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

203 companies · $75.8M reported

  1. AME CONSULTING ENGINEERS PC$7.2M
    CHARLOTTE, NC · 37 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BURLINGTON, MA · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. METAIRIE, LA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

25 companies · $58.6M reported

  1. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$18.6M
    DENVER, CO · 39 subawards
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 6 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 27 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.$160.8M−75% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 9 entities · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+2 more
  2. OST INC$141.9M−61% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesEnergy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.