Federal contractor · WOODLAND HILLS, CA

STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.

STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. received -$1.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards. Since FY2017: -$3.9M. Its largest customer was Federal Transit Administration (-$1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
-$1.3M
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
DBKMDJPMDY63
Parent company
STANTEC CONSULTING MICHIGAN INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. company family: 56 registered entities, $51.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.DENVER, CO · Family page
    $19M
  2. STANTEC-AECOM SIOP JVBURLINGTON, MA
    $9.1M
  3. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.BURLINGTON, MA
    $7.6M
  4. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.WASHINGTON, DC
    $3.8M
  5. STANTEC-VOLKERT-JMT A JVLAUREL, MD
    $3.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 722KFY2017
  2. -83.6KFY2018
  3. -1.2MFY2019
  4. -1.2MFY2020
  5. -101.5KFY2021
  6. -479.5KFY2022
  7. -194.4KFY2023
  8. -1.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Transit Administration-$1.3M0.0%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. THIS IS A PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT (PMO) SERVICES CONTRACT THAT PROVIDES FTA REGION VI (TRO6) WITH PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT SERVICES FOR THE NORTHGATE TRANSIT CENTER AND BRT ON MESA, DYER AND MONTANA CORRIDORS PROJECTS.$325.6K
    Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Dec 7, 2018 – Jan 28, 2026· 0004
  2. THIS IS A PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT (PMO) SERVICES CONTRACT THAT PROVIDES FTA WITH CONTRACT SUPPORT CAPABLE OF RENDERING CRITICAL PROGRAM INPUTS FOR A VARIETY OF FTA PROGRAM DECISIONS.$105.7K
    Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Mar 3, 2017 – Jun 25, 2026· 0002
  3. THIS IS A PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT (PMO) SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE FTA REGION VI (TRO6) WITH PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT SERVICES FOR THE AUSTIN/CMTA COMMUTER&FREIGHT RAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.$53K
    Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Jun 7, 2017 – Apr 29, 2026· 0003

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

203 companies · $75.8M reported

  1. AME CONSULTING ENGINEERS PC$7.2M
    CHARLOTTE, NC · 37 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HALEY & ALDRICH, INC$4M
    BURLINGTON, MA · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. N-Y ASSOCIATES INC$3.1M
    METAIRIE, LA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

25 companies · $58.6M reported

  1. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$18.6M
    DENVER, CO · 39 subawards
  2. CH2M HILL, INC$11.3M
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 6 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BRICE TURNAGAIN JV LLC$7.9M
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 27 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.$160.8M−75% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 9 entities · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+2 more
  2. OST INC$141.9M−61% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$444.1M−65% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesEnergy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.