Federal contractor · WEYMOUTH, MA

STASINOS MARINE LLC

STASINOS MARINE LLC received $1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+314% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $1.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DWLBLKMZGLD5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 79.3KFY2021
  2. -10.3KFY2022
  3. 21.9KFY2024
  4. 247.8KFY2025
  5. 1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$1M100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Transportation & logistics$1M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Jefferson County, TX$548.7K53%
  2. Norfolk County, MA$298.8K29%
  3. Philadelphia County, PA$178.5K17%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TUG CONTRACT SPEARHEAD TOW$548.7K
    Department of the Navy· Jefferson County, TX· Transportation & logistics· Apr 7, 2026 – Apr 7, 2026· N3220526P5098
  2. TUGCON NOR DECOM$298.8K
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk County, MA· Transportation & logistics· Jan 30, 2026 – Feb 4, 2026· N3220526P5051
  3. TUGCON VOYAGE CHARTER; JONES ACT OPEN-OCEAN TOW$247.8K
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Transportation & logistics· Sep 23, 2025 – Oct 14, 2025· N3220525P5094
  4. DRY CARGO TUG CONTRACT$178.5K
    Department of the Navy· Philadelphia County, PA· Transportation & logistics· May 22, 2026 – May 22, 2026· N3220526P5147

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $482.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $64K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $546.8K reported

  1. WEEKS MARINE, INC.$508.6K
    COVINGTON, LA · 4 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. 381 CONSTRUCTORS$38.2K
    OMAHA, NE · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SERENA SHIPPING LTD$1.4M
    VALLETTA, MLT · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Deep sea, coastal, and Great Lakes water transportation
  2. STENOIL KS$1.5M
    BERGEN, NOR · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Deep sea, coastal, and Great Lakes water transportation
  3. FURETANK REDERI AKTIEBOLAG$1M−100% in FY2026
    DONSO, SWE · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Deep sea, coastal, and Great Lakes water transportation

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.