Federal contractor · KINGSTON, ID
STONE RIDGE CONSTRUCTION, INC
STONE RIDGE CONSTRUCTION, INC received $3.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (+113% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $22.8M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($3.6M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $3.6M
- New awards
- 11
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 4.8%
- UEI
- JY11MP8CNKD1
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.2MFY2017
- 2MFY2018
- 1.3MFY2019
- 712.6KFY2020
- 2.9MFY2021
- 3.5MFY2022
- 3.3MFY2023
- 2.7MFY2024
- 1.7MFY2025
- 3.6MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Forest Service$3.6M100%11 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$3.6M100.0%
- Facilities & utilities$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Lincoln County, MT$1M29%
- Flathead County, MT$682.3K19%
- Missoula County, MT$657K18%
- Benewah County, ID$382.6K11%
- Beaverhead County, MT$305.9K8.6%
- Mineral County, MT$268.9K7.6%
- Shoshone County, ID$170.2K4.8%
- Boundary County, ID$45K1.3%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition4.8%US 39% · $170.2K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions4.8%US 8.7% · $170.2K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Forest Service· Lincoln County, MT· Construction & real property· Dec 10, 2025 – Sep 21, 2026· 1240LU26F0003
- Forest Service· Flathead County, MT· Construction & real property· May 22, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· 1240LU26F0040
- Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· Jun 24, 2026 – Jun 24, 2026· 1240LU26F0077
- Forest Service· Benewah County, ID· Construction & real property· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· 1240LU26F0061
- Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Jun 18, 2026 – Jun 18, 2026· 1240LU26F0064
- Forest Service· Mineral County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 12, 2026 – Aug 12, 2026· 1240LU26F0094
- Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· 1240LU26F0051
- Forest Service· Sanders County, MT· Construction & real property· Jul 12, 2022 – Mar 18, 2026· 1240LU22F0081
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ESCHEMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY$8M−70% in FY2026BROWNSVILLE, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Highway, street, and bridge construction
- JILK HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, INC.$9.2M−98% in FY2026BREA, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Highway, street, and bridge construction
- MACAULEY CONSTRUCTION INC$9.7M+2,441% in FY2026PLACERVILLE, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Highway, street, and bridge construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.