Federal contractor · ROCKVILLE, MD

STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE INC

STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE INC received $92.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 56 awards (+6.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $530.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($77.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$92.7M
New awards
56
Sole-source
0.3%
Single offer
0.3%
UEI
HDFLNVD97EJ3
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16MFY2017
  2. 26.4MFY2018
  3. 34.8MFY2019
  4. 29.3MFY2020
  5. 36.7MFY2021
  6. 50.9MFY2022
  7. 66.7MFY2023
  8. 90.1MFY2024
  9. 87.3MFY2025
  10. 92.7MFY2026
  11. -2.3KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$77.4M84%
    40 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$5.7M6.2%
    2 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$5.5M6.0%
    9 awards
  4. Federal Aviation Administration$3.7M4.0%
    2 awards
  5. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management$248.5K0.3%
    2 awards
  6. Federal Emergency Management Agency-$0.010.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$86.6M94%
  2. Professional services$5.7M6.1%
  3. IT & telecom$322.7K0.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, MD$36.4M39%
  2. San Diego County, CA$12.7M14%
  3. Fresno County, CA$7.7M8.3%
  4. Ward County, ND$7.4M8.0%
  5. Craven County, NC$5.7M6.2%
  6. Oklahoma County, OK$3.7M4.0%
  7. Vernon Parish, LA$3M3.3%
  8. Davis County, UT$2.7M2.9%
  9. Kitsap County, WA$2.5M2.7%
  10. Monroe County, FL$2.4M2.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.6%
    US 39% · $571.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.3%
    US 30% · $322.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.3%
    US 8.7% · $248.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$322.7K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. CFT MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES$31.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Jun 17, 2021 – Jun 12, 2026· FA810821F0033
  2. 1106TH THEATER AVIATION SUSTAINMENT MAINTENANCE GROUP (TASMG) FRESNO, CA CLINS/SLINS X002, X003, X004, AND X005 TO BE INCLUDED VIA FUTURE MODS WHEN NEED ARISES.$28.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Fresno County, CA· Equipment maintenance· May 10, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· FA810824FB003
  3. CONTRACT FIELD TEAMS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR U-2 AIRCRAFT OID LEVEL MAINTENANCE AT 9TH RECONNAISSANCE WING, BEALE AFB, CA$20.5M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Dec 13, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· FA810824F0003
  4. FLIGHT LINE, CORROSION CONTROL, TOOL ROOM AND "O" LEVEL MAINTENANCE SUPPORT (HSM-40, MAYPORT, FL)$19.5M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Feb 15, 2023 – Jun 10, 2026· FA810823F0014
  5. CONTRACT FIELD TEAM MAINTENANCE SERVICE TO SUPPORT NAVAL AVIATION, MAINTENANCE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE (NAMCE) AT NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, VA$17.3M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Sep 26, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· FA810824FB011
  6. AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS OF AIRCRAFT "I" LEVEL MAINTENANCE SUPPORT$17M
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Jun 27, 2022 – Jun 12, 2026· FA810822F0011
  7. TECHNICAL AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPORT SERVICES (TISS)$15.9M
    Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Professional services· Sep 13, 2021 – Jun 5, 2026· N0025321F3003
  8. 3RD MARINE AIRCRAFT WING MV-22 OSPREY SQUADRONS O AND I LEVEL MAINTENANCE SUPPORT MCAS MIRAMAR/CAMP PENDLETON, CA$11.6M
    Department of the Air Force· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· FA810826FB038

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $630.8K reported

  1. INTEGRATED ATMOSPHERICS, LLC.$630.8K
    NORMAN, OK · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NOVA TECHNOLOGIES AN EMPLOYEE-OWNED ENGINEERING COMPANY$234.6M−2.1% in FY2026
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ATEC INC$181.1M−67% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, TX · 3 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. ALSALAM AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES COMPANY$298.6M−100% in FY2026
    RIYADH, SAU · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.