Federal contractor · LEES SUMMIT, MO

STRATEGIC VALUE SOLUTIONS, INC.

STRATEGIC VALUE SOLUTIONS, INC. received $3.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 32 awards (+3.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $37.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.2M
New awards
32
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
31%
UEI
FAS6ELEG65M5
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.2MFY2017
  2. 3.5MFY2018
  3. 6.4MFY2019
  4. 4.2MFY2020
  5. 3.5MFY2021
  6. 4.9MFY2022
  7. 3.4MFY2023
  8. 3.3MFY2024
  9. 3.1MFY2025
  10. 3.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$2.7M84%
    16 awards
  2. Department of State$507.2K16%
    16 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$3.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$931.8K29%
  2. Warren County, MS$929.8K29%
  3. Philadelphia County, PA$343.4K11%
  4. Johnson County, MO$268.4K8.4%
  5. Sacramento County, CA$203.5K6.3%
  6. Anne Arundel County, MD$170.5K5.3%
  7. El Paso County, CO$167.7K5.2%
  8. Contra Costa County, CA$126.8K4.0%
  9. Tulsa County, OK$123K3.8%
  10. Cochise County, AZ$112K3.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition31%
    US 39% · $1M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions31%
    US 8.7% · $1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TASK ORDER - YAZOO BACKWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN$734.7K
    Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Construction & real property· Dec 9, 2025 – Dec 9, 2025· W912EE26FA001
  2. RISK AND VALUE ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS FOR PORT OF SPAIN, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO.$637.9K
    Department of State· Jackson County, MO· Professional services· Sep 26, 2023 – Jun 24, 2026· 19AQMM23F2847
  3. RISK VE TALLINN NEC$436.3K
    Department of State· Professional services· Sep 10, 2025 – Jul 31, 2026· 19AQMM25F1544
  4. OBO COST VALUE ENGINEERING RISK SANTIAGO CSU$407.2K
    Department of State· Construction & real property· Feb 9, 2026 – Jun 24, 2026· 19AQMM26F0151
  5. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL VE STUDY PIER IMPACT PROTECTION PROJECT$343.4K
    Department of the Army· Philadelphia County, PA· Construction & real property· Jan 21, 2026 – Jan 21, 2026· W912BU26FA008
  6. SCHEDULING AND REA/TIA SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NEW U.S. EMBASSY COMPOUND (NEC) PROJECT IN BEIRUT, LEBANON$323.8K
    Department of State· Jackson County, MO· Professional services· Aug 14, 2024 – Feb 24, 2026· 19AQMM24F1636
  7. BAGHDAD BEC POWERPLANT VALUE ENGINEERING/RISK$280.8K
    Department of State· Construction & real property· Jul 15, 2026 – Jul 28, 2026· 19AQMM26F0914
  8. A-E SERVICES SATOC TASK ORDER CONTRACT$268.4K
    Department of the Army· Johnson County, MO· Construction & real property· Jan 27, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W912DQ26FA036

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $516.3K (6 subawards)

5 primes

  1. CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION$193.4K37%
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 1 subaward
  2. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$122K24%
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 2 subawards
  3. AECOM SERVICES, LLC$73.2K14%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  4. JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICES COMPANY$70.5K14%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  5. THE MASON & HANGER GROUP INC.$57.2K11%
    LEXINGTON, KY · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $379.2K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $471.9K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $516.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

16 companies · $5.7M reported

  1. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$3M
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 49 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$678.5K
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION$299.9K
    FAIRFAX, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LEO A DALY - PERKINS AND WILL A JOINT VENTURE$8.6M−96% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SCOTT BROWNRIGG LIMITED$8.5M−100% in FY2026
    LONDON, GBR · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MASON & HANGER + MEAD & HUNT JOINT VENTURE$8.5M−98% in FY2026
    TULSA, OK · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.