Federal contractor · CEDAR CITY, UT

SUH'DUTSING CONTRACTING SERVICES

SUH'DUTSING CONTRACTING SERVICES received $128.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $79M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($95.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$128.3K
New awards
5
Sole-source
75%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NMNYELXTK441
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programHUBZone firmNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11.7MFY2020
  2. 12.3MFY2021
  3. 15.2MFY2022
  4. 18.5MFY2023
  5. 15.4MFY2024
  6. 5.8MFY2025
  7. 128.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$128.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition75%
    US 39% · $95.9K
  • Sole-source awards75%
    US 30% · $95.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Multnomah County, OR· Construction & real property· Jul 24, 2024 – Apr 16, 2026· W50S8Y24C0002
  2. Department of the Army· Lake County, IL· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2023 – Jan 20, 2026· W912EK23C0048
  3. Department of the Army· Milwaukee County, WI· Construction & real property· Sep 3, 2025 – Apr 28, 2026· W912EK25CA015
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Iron County, UT· Construction & real property· Mar 14, 2025 – Jul 23, 2026· 140L0625C0009
  5. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Iron County, UT· IT & telecom· Jul 24, 2025 – Mar 19, 2026· 140A1625P0042

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RENO, NV · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. W-T JOINT VENTURE$18.9M−93% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. AE WEST LLC$19.3M−98% in FY2026
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.