Federal contractor · CEDAR CITY, UT
SUH'DUTSING CONTRACTING SERVICES
SUH'DUTSING CONTRACTING SERVICES received $128.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $79M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($95.9K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $128.3K
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 75%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- NMNYELXTK441
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 11.7MFY2020
- 12.3MFY2021
- 15.2MFY2022
- 18.5MFY2023
- 15.4MFY2024
- 5.8MFY2025
- 128.3KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$95.9K75%3 awards
- Bureau of Land Management$32.4K25%1 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$128.3K100%
Where the work was performed
- Lake County, IL$59.5K46%
- Milwaukee County, WI$36.4K28%
- Iron County, UT$32.4K25%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition75%US 39% · $95.9K
- Sole-source awards75%US 30% · $95.9K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Multnomah County, OR· Construction & real property· Jul 24, 2024 – Apr 16, 2026· W50S8Y24C0002
- Department of the Army· Lake County, IL· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2023 – Jan 20, 2026· W912EK23C0048
- Department of the Army· Milwaukee County, WI· Construction & real property· Sep 3, 2025 – Apr 28, 2026· W912EK25CA015
- Bureau of Land Management· Iron County, UT· Construction & real property· Mar 14, 2025 – Jul 23, 2026· 140L0625C0009
- Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Iron County, UT· IT & telecom· Jul 24, 2025 – Mar 19, 2026· 140A1625P0042
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ACCEL 7 JV LLC$19MRENO, NV · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
- W-T JOINT VENTURE$18.9M−93% in FY2026OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
- AE WEST LLC$19.3M−98% in FY2026ANN ARBOR, MI · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.