Federal contractor · NAMYANGJU-SI

SUP-A CO., LTD.

SUP-A CO., LTD. received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (+35% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $28.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
13
Sole-source
13%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HDA9JNAAKTT1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2017
  2. 809.4KFY2018
  3. 1.2MFY2019
  4. 650.7KFY2020
  5. 574.8KFY2021
  6. 13.4MFY2022
  7. 5.8MFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 1.3MFY2025
  10. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 10 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$1.4M75%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$443.5K25%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1.8M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition13%
    US 39% · $240.5K
  • Sole-source awards13%
    US 30% · $240.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 8 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 30, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· W91QVN26PA005
  2. Department of the Army· Other equipment & supplies· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W90VN926PA026
  3. Department of State· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 14, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· 19KS7026P0485
  4. Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· W91QVN26FC062
  5. Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 1, 2026 – Mar 1, 2026· W91QVN26FC135
  6. Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· W91QVN26FC175
  7. Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 1, 2026 – May 1, 2026· W91QVN26FC150
  8. Department of State· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 30, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026· 19KS7026P0606

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 15 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.$2.4M−12% in FY2026
    NASHVILLE, TN · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturingArmy · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing
  2. DANGJIN-SI, KOR · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing
  3. TRU-HITCH, INC.$1.1M−100% in FY2026
    BARKHAMSTED, CT · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.